Google goes through all your personal information for their benefit and profit. Google Drive is quasi-dangerous for personal use, among friends, or within a company. Google Drive is unnecessary unless the person truly wants to do public sharing. Only at times where a lot of files got renamed for one reason or another. Better for protection of personal data and file transfers. Content matched files would only get their timestamps synced, but other files that don't match by size and name, or by content if both of those matched, would still be fully synced.Īlso, this should definitely be optional, since I wouldn't want to do the content sub-check every time. Note that this would be part of an otherwise full sync. Which can make the sync far longer than needed if there a lot of files and/or they are large. Even if the rename is applied equally on both sides, if the timestamps also change then you end up copying a large number of files that are identical except for the timestamps. The specific scenario that this applies to (or at least one such scenario) is when renaming a large number of files. Applying the content check not on the full comparison, but only on the files selected, such as when using file size and time, and using it to minimize the actual number of files copied in full. Then if the content is in fact identical, only the timestamps would be updated instead of syncing the entire file. I'd love to see an option for the sync operation (especially on Mirror) to test just those files selected for the sync to see if the content matches where the file size and name are also identical.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |